The trial begins as the juries hear the evidence of a husband, John, who's killed his wife, Helen, with a hammer but denies murder. Divisions and disagreements soon form between the two juries...
As the jurors hear from the defence, one feels that there's 'victim blaming' at play, while another begins to sympathise with the defendant. But will the 'loss of control' plea impact their verdicts?
The prosecution cross-examine the defendant. The jurors become increasingly divided and a character statement leaves both juries conflicted. With the verdict approaching, will they reach the same one?
The prosecution and defence give their closing speeches and the juries retire to decide their verdicts. After heated debates, both juries finally reach their verdicts... but are they the same one?
The BAFTA-winning series returns, with a brand-new restaged real-life murder trial. A jury hear the case of a young mum who killed her boyfriend. Was it self-defence?
The defence build their case, presenting evidence of the young mum's boyfriend's previous violent behaviour. Divisions, alliances and friendships begin to form within the jury.
As the prosecution try to prove that the defendant is lying about the night of the murder, the jurors' disagreements escalate, arguments erupt and accusations fly.
The defence reveal a surprising new piece of evidence, and both sides present their closing arguments. Can the opposed jurors find common ground and deliver justice?
